IN THE COURT OF VI SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT KARACHI
EAST
Civil
Suit No. / 2008
The M/S. XYZ
Through
it’s proprietor Muhammad …………………….…………..… Plaintiff
VERSUS
The M/s Sui Southern Gas Company (Ltd)
Through its Chief
Executive & Managing Director,
Office at St. 4/B, Block-14,
Sir Shah Suleman Road,
Gulshan-e-Iqbal, Karachi……..………………………… Defendant
SUIT FOR DECLARATION &
PERMANENT INJUNCTION
Respectfully Shewiths as under:
1.
That
plaintiff is sole proprietor of the M/s Eating House and as such on 10-04-2000,
deposited the required fee for installation of Sui Gas Commercial connection
with the application. (Photo stat copy of application is enclosed herewith and
marked as Annexure ‘A’).
2.
That
in the beginning, the defendant installed an old meter bearing No. M-014518090,
which was removed from other place saying that it would be changed when new
meter will be available to the Company
as there is shortage of new meters. (Photo stat copy of first bill is enclosed
herewith and marked as annexure ‘B’).
3.
That
the plaintiff is regularly paying bill for the case consumed by him. The detail
is incorporated below:
MONTH YEAR BILL
JUNE 2000 10479/00
JULY = 8660/00
JULY = 8660/00
AUG = 9370/00
SEP = 8190/-
OCT = 9540/-
NOV = 7310/-
DEC = 1970/-
JAN 2001 8910/-
FEB = 8550/-
DEC 2002 6433/-
JAN 2003 6243/-
AUG 2004 4730/-
JULY 2005 6389/-
(Photo stat copies of paid bills are
enclosed herewith and marked as Annexure C to C-13).
4.
That in December 2006, the defendant replaced
old meter by new meter with out any intimation to the plaintiff for which the
plaintiff has been paying bill regularly. (Photo stat copies of paid bills are
enclosed herewith and marked as Annexure D to D-2).
5.
That
all times the defendant informed to the plaintiff verbally that the matter is
clear and not tempered but they changed the same only for their own
satisfaction. Since the installation of first meter up to the month of May 2007,
there was no dispute between the parties.
6.
That
in May 2007, the subordinates of the defendant’s once again come to remove the
gas meter for checking without any reason and intimation. The plaintiff halted
the officials of the defendant not to remove the meter as there is no cogent
reason. The official of the defendant annoyed and left extending threats.
7.
That
in June2007, the plaintiff received a claim notice from the defendant for
payment of Rs.340456/- within 15 days the receipt of the notice/bill. The detail
of payment incorporated in the bill is reproduced below:
Consumption
for the period ----MCF---1,368
Actual
Billed
----MCF---304
Consumption
short billed ----MCF---1,064
Amount
short billed ----Rs. ---269,718
Add:GST ----Rs. ---40,458
Add:LPS ----Rs. ---30,280
Total
recoverable amount of
short billed with LPS ----Rs. ---340,456
You
are advised to pay Rs.340, 456/- the value of consumption on account of meter
tempering for the period from November 2005 to October 2006, within 15 days of
receipt of this claim notice.
8.
That
July 2007 the defendant’s field staff once again changed the gas meter of the
plaintiff without any reason and intimation in his absence and installed
another new meter bearing No. Mo. 014518090. On that plaintiff was depositing
monthly bill as per reading of new meter. (Photo stat copy of the paid Bill is enclosed
herewith marked as annexure ‘E’).
9.
That
claim notice/bill of the defendant is incorrect, manipulated and is only to
harass the plaintiff with malafide intensions.
10.
That
the plaintiff was regularly paying monthly bill and there is no default on part
of the plaintiff as well as prior to this, not any complaint was ever made by
the defendant of tempering in the meter reading during the period given in
claim notice/bill.
11.
That
the defendant about one month before have removed the gas meter of the
plaintiff for which plaintiff’s hotel is closed and he has been denied and
deprived of his fundamental right. The plaintiff’s family starving and has been
perversely affected as his livelihood has been snatched.
12.
That
plaintiff is ready and willing to pay the payment for the gas consumed justly
and fairly and this is legitimate right of the plaintiff to have gas meter to
earn his livelihoods and refusal by the defendant is denied of fundamental
rights of the plaintiff and such refusal is liable to be struck down by the
order of this court during the pendency of the case as the justice requires
that every citizen is entitled to avail facilities subject to payment of bill
if any for which the plaintiff is ready and willing. The claim notice issued by
the defendant is manipulated, hence is liable to be set aside and declared to
be null and void. (Photocopy of the bill of August 2007 is submitted herewith
as Annexure-F).
13.
That
cause of action arose firstly in the month of December 2006, when subordinate
of defendant remove the meter bearing No. M. 014518090 and installed new meter
bearing No.136943314, and secondly on month of June 2007 when the defendant
issued claim notice to plaintiff to pay Rs.3,40,456/- for so called meter
tempering and thirdly in the month of July when subordinates once again change
the meter and installed new meter bearing No. 014518090 and verbally informed
that there is no fault in the meter and
fourthly in the month of August 2007, when subordinates of the defendant removed
the meter without any complaint and issue bill for the month of August 2007
adding Rs.3,40,456/- with own hand writing due to ulterior motives and same is
continue day by day till filling of this suit. The cause of action accrued
within the local limits of Police Station New Town as the office of the
defendant situates therein.
14.
That
the suit for the purpose of jurisdiction and is valued is of Rs.3,40,456/- for
which proper court fee has been affixed.
15.
That
the plaintiff’s earlier suit No.4444/2008 was rejected on the ground that the
defendant has not been properly described in the title of plaint, hence present
suit almost on the same facts and grounds.
PRAYER
The plaintiff therefore
prays for judgment and decree in his favor and against the defendant as under:
-
a> To declare that the Paid bill up to July 2007, are
correct and claim notice and bill for the month of August 2007 of defendant is
incorrect and manipulated and based on malafide and is liable to be declared
null and void having no legal affect.
b> To declare that the defendant has malafidely
removed the gas meter of the plaintiff for which they were not entitled.
c> TO
direct the defendant to reinstall the illegal removed the gas meter of the
plaintiff and restrain them permanently from removing the same.
d> Cost
of the suit.
e> Any
other equitable relief(s) which this Honorable Court deems fit and proper under
the circumstances of this suit.
Karachi.
Plaintiff
Dated: 09-08-2008.
Advocate for the plaintiff
V E R I F I C A T I O N
I, Muhammad, Muslim adult, the proprietor of XYZ, Karachi
am the Plaintiff above name do hereby verify on oath that whatever has been
stated above are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and my
information.
D e p o n e n t
IN THE COURT OF VI SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT KARACHI EAST
Civil
Suit No. / 2008
M/S. XX …………………………..……………………….
Plaintiff
VERSUS
Sui Southern
Gas Company (Ltd)……….…… Defendant
APPLICATION UNDER ORDER XXXIX RULE 1&2 READ WITH
SECTION 151 OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, 1908
On
consideration of facts and grounds disclosed in the accompanying affidavit as
well as in the memo of plaint, it is most respectfully prayed that this
honorable Court may be pleased to grant mandatory order, directing therein to
the defendant to install the gas meter removed from the premises of the
plaintiff.
Ad an interim injunction is to be solicited
meanwhile in terms of main prayer in the greater interest of justice and equity.
Karachi.
Dated: 09-08-2008.
Advocate for the plaintiff
IN THE COURT OF VI SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT KARACHI
EAST
Civil
Suit No. / 2008
The M/S. XYZ …………………….…………..…
Plaintiff
VERSUS
The M/s SSGC (Ltd) ……………………………
Defendant
AFFIDAVIT
I, Muhammad, Muslim
adult, the proprietor of XYZ, Karachi, do hereby state on oath as under:-
1. That I am the plaintiff in
above matter, as such fully conversant with the fact thereof and able to depose
the same.
2. That
the accompanying application under order XXXIX Rule 1&2 read with section
151 of CPC has been drafted and filed by my counsel under my specific
instruction, contents therein are true and correct.
3. That
I have good prima facie case and balance of convenience lies in my favor as the
defendant has disconnected the Gas and due to that plaintiff is suffering the
monitory and big financial loss.
4. That
for the sake of brevity, I adopt the contents of accompanying application as
well as main plaint as an integral part and parcel of this affidavit and in
order to avoid duplication do not repeat the same.
5. That
I shall be seriously prejudiced and shall suffer an irreparable loss until
accompanying application allowed.
6. That
whatever stated above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and
belief.
Karachi
Dated: .09-08-2008. Deponent
Identified by me
No comments:
Post a Comment