Sunday, October 7, 2012

Mandatory Injunction





IN THE COURT OF     SR. CIVIL JUDGE KARACHI EAST
(Civil original Jurisdiction)
Civil suit  #.        /2004


M/S. Kathiawar Co-Operative
Housing Society LTD, through
Honorary General Secretary,
Karachi       …………….………..……… ………...             Plaintiff.

VERSUS

          Chief Controller of Building
          Karachi Building Control Authority
          Having its office at Annex Building
          Civic Center, University Road,
           Karachi ………………………………………………          Defendant


SUIT FOR MANDATORY INJUNCTION


The plaintiff above named most respectfully implores as under:-

That the  plaintiff is well known Co-operative Housing Society Registered under the Co-operative  Societies Act, bearing Registration # S-554, vide dated 25th February ,1948, having its office at AdamJee Nagar, Block ‘A’, Tipu Sultan Road Karachi. Plaintiff is serving its members for the last more than half of century, on non political and non commercial basis.

That the plaintiff has 99 years lease hold rights of plot as plaintiff was allotted 7 Amenity plots including present one. (Photo state copy of Certificate of KCHS Union Limited   dated 20.03.2004 is appended herewith and marked as ‘A’).

That the plaintiff got Building plan approved from the Karachi Building Control Authority on 5.04.1974 and constructed Community Centre accordingly. ( photo copy of letter and Building plan are  appended here with and marked as ‘B’  and ‘C’).

That the plot is being used since 1974, for members of the society and residents of the area for matrimonial, religious (Traveeh) and Eid prayers etc.

That due to existence of Hamdard University in front of the plot # SNPA-30, Car parking problem became acute, which needed solution. The plaintiff therefore re-planned the community centre by making a provision of car parking Area of about 1/3rd size of the plot within the compound of the plot and entrusted the works of preparing the plans to the engineer, while the plaintiff was in the process of submitting the plan, a notice was received of unauthorized construction from defendant to which plaintiff replied. But demolition squad of the defendant demolished the structure.

That on 28.06.2004, plaintiff  met the Controller of Building Mr. Akhter Ahmed in his office, who advised to make some correction in the proposed plan and to re-submit the same in his office.

That the plaintiff on 2.07.2004 again approached the office of defendant for some further clarification with the engineer on suggested correction of the Controller of Building but he was informed that the Chief Controller/defendant has ordered to demolish the Community Centre constructed by plaintiff on plot # SNPA-3-on Tuesday 06.07.2004.

That the decision of defendant to demolish the construction raised by plaintiff on plot # SNPA-30 is absolutely illegal, based on malafide and ill-will toward the plaintiff as the defendant should first decide the approval of plaintiff’s plan and should exercise its discretion in favor of the public interest and not arbitrary and in present circumstance defendant are not entitled to demolish construction raised there on.

That interference/disturbance of the defendants in the renovation work of the plaintiff is absolutely illegal and without lawful authority as defendants have no right in any way to interfere, hence present suit having no other alternate as defendants are violating the civil rights of the plaintiff and no body including the defendant.

That the  cause of action accrued to the plaintiff against the defendants firstly on 28 -06-2004, secondly on 02.07-2004 when plaintiff came to know about the decision of defendant about demolition of plaintiff’s construction and it remained to continue day to day till the filing of this suit within the local limits of police station Baharabad Karachi East  as cause of action accrued therein as the property also  situates therein and the same is within the territorial jurisdiction of this  court.

That for the purpose of pecuniary jurisdiction, the suit is valued at RS. 200/- for injunction for which no court fee is required to be affixed.
                            
P R A Y E R

The plaintiff therefore prays for judgment and decree in its favor and against defendant as under.

Permanently restrain the defendants, their agents  and all other person (s) working for them and on their  behalf in any manners,  from interfering/disturbing and to demolition  construction raised by plaintiff through its contractor on plot #  S.N.P.A 31, Amenty, Area Block # 7 & 8 Kathiawar Co-operative Housing Society Ltd Karachi .

To direct the defendant to proceed and approve the plan of plaintiff  and regularize the construction so raised by plaintiff on plot #  S.N.P.A 31, Amenty, Area Block # 7 & 8 Kathiawar Co-operative Housing Society Ltd Karachi.

Cost of the suit.

 Any other equitable relief (s) as this Honorable Court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of this suit.
 Karachi.
Dated: 05 -07-2004.                                                      Plaintiff



APPLICATION  UNDER  ORDER  XXXIX  RULE 1 & 2

READ WITH   SECTION CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE  


On consideration of facts and grounds disclosed in the accompanying affidavit, as well as in main plaint, it is most respectfully prayed on behalf of the plaintiff above named that this Honorable court may be pleased to grant injunction, restraining, therein to the defendant their agents person (s) working for them and on their  behalf in all manners,  from interfering/disturbing and to demolition the  construction raised by plaintiff through its contractor on plot # 31, Karachi pending disposal  of this suit.

An ad interim injunction is to be solicited mean solicited mean while in terms of main prayer in the greater interest of justice and equity.

Karachi.
Dated: 05 -07-2004                                    Advocate for the plaintiff

A F F I D A V I T
That I am plaintiff in the above matter, as such am fully conversant with the facts thereof.

That the accompanying application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 read with Section 151 Code of Civil Procedure  has been drafted and filed by my counsel under my specific instructions, contents therein are true and correct.

That I have good prima facie case and balance of convince lies in my favor as the defendant is illegally and without lawful authority interfering/disturbing in construction work, which is being carried on by plaintiff through its contractor over plot # S.N.P.A 31, Amenity Area Block # 7 & 8 Kathiawar Co-operative Housing Society Ltd Karachi for which plaintiff has 99 years lease hold rights.

That for the seek of brevity, I adopt the contents of accompanying application as well as  main  plaint  as an integral part and parcel of this affidavit and  in order to avoid duplication do not repeat the same.

That I say that plaintiff shall be seriously prejudiced and shall suffer an irreparable loss, until accompanying application is allowed.

That whatever stated above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information and belief.
Karachi. 
Dated:                                                                                                                       DEPONENT


No comments:

Post a Comment